Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080629›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Industry 4.0 In-Line AI Quality Control of Plastic Injection Molded Parts.

Saeid Saeidi Aminabadi, Paul Tabatabai, Alexander Steiner, Dieter Paul Gruber, Walter Friesenbichler, Christoph Habersohn, Gerald Berger-Weber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Saeid Saeidi AminabadiDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Science, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Otto Gloeckel str. 2, 8700 Leoben, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0368-3954
Paul TabatabaiPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Rosegger str. 12, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Alexander SteinerPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Rosegger str. 12, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Dieter Paul GruberPolymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH, Rosegger str. 12, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Walter FriesenbichlerDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Science, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Otto Gloeckel str. 2, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Christoph HabersohnInstitute for Production Engineering and Photonic Technologies, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/311, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Gerald Berger-WeberInstitute of Polymer Processing and Digital Transformation, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-6432
Polymer Competence Center Leoben (Austria) · ATMontanuniversität Leoben · ATJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATTU Wien · AT

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency INQCIM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic in-line process quality control plays a crucial role to enhance production efficiency in the injection molding industry. Industry 4.0 is leading the productivity and efficiency of companies to minimize scrap rates and strive for zero-defect production, especially in the injection molding industry. In this study, a fully automated closed-loop injection molding (IM) setup with a communication platform via OPC UA was built in compliance with Industry 4.0. The setup included fully automated inline measurements, in-line data analysis, and an AI control system to set the new machine parameters via the OPC UA communication protocol. The surface quality of the injection molded parts was rated using the ResNet-18 convolutional neural network, which was trained on data gathered by a heuristic approach. Further, eight different machine learning models for predicting the part quality (weight, surface quality, and dimensional properties) and for predicting sensor data were trained using data from a variety of production information sources, including in-mold sensors, injection molding machine (IMM) sensors, ambient sensors, and inline product quality measurements. These models are the backbone of the AI control system, which is a heuristic model predictive control (MPC) method. This method was applied to find new sets of machine parameters during production to control the specified part quality feature. The control system and predictive models were successfully tested for two groups of quality features: Geometry control and surface quality control. Control parameters were limited to injection speed and holding pressure. Moreover, the geometry control was repeated with mold temperature as an additional control parameter.

Indexed as

AI quality controlclosed-loop quality controldeep neural networkdeep residual learningdimensional features predictioninjection molding of plasticsin-line quality controlpredictive controlsurface quality predictionweight prediction

Identifiers

PMID36080629
PMCPMC9459821
OpenAlexW4293770357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.