ArticlePolymers2022
Experimental Validation of Numerical Model for Thermomechanical Performance of Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Process: Effect of Process Parameters.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual Stresses and Distortion in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Multi-Objective Optimization of Mechanical and Geometric Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Porous Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thermo-Mechanical Approach to Material Extrusion Process During Fused Filament Fabrication of Polymeric Samples.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Numerical Prediction and Experimental Validation of Deposited Filaments in Direct Ink Writing: Deposition Status and Profile Dimension.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Material Extrusion 3D Printing (ME3DP) Process Simulations of Polymeric Porous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of carbon fiber reinforcement on dimensional variations of 3D printed polyamide-6 composites: A simulation study.Turkish journal of chemistry · 2023Article
- New Approach for Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Soft and Elastic Articles from Liquid-PVC-Based Consumable Materials.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The material extrusion additive manufacturing (MEAM) process for polymers seems straightforward. However, several controlled and uncontrolled factors affect the 3D printed product quality, e.g., MEAM process parameters, thermomechanical properties of the material, and part design. Therefore, it is crucial to understand these interlinked factors of part geometry, material properties, and 3D printing (3DP) process parameters to optimize 3D printed product quality. The numerical models and simulation tools can predict the thermomechanical performance of the MEAM process under given input parameters (material, design, and process variables) and reduce the research and development costs significantly. However, the numerical models and tools need further exploration and validation of simulation predictions for their adaptability and reliability. Therefore, in this study, numerical simulations were performed to observe the impact of process parameters on the part quality of MEAM 3D printed components. The two crucial process parameters (i.e., extrusion temperature and layer resolution) were varied while keeping the other process parameters, part geometry (tensile testing coupon), and material properties (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)) constant. These two process parameters were sequentially optimized for optimum part quality, first by varying the extrusion temperature and secondly by changing the printing resolution using the optimum printing temperature. The 3DP process quality was evaluated in terms of dimensional accuracy, distortions, and residual stresses. Finally, the specimens were 3D printed under similar process conditions to validate the numerical model predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.