Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080444›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development of GBRT Model as a Novel and Robust Mathematical Model to Predict and Optimize the Solubility of Decitabine as an Anti-Cancer Drug.

Walid Kamal Abdelbasset, Shereen H Elsayed, Sameer Alshehri, Bader Huwaimel, Ahmed Alobaida, Amal M Alsubaiyel, Abdulsalam A Alqahtani, Mohamed A El Hamd, Kumar Venkatesan, Kareem M AboRas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Walid Kamal AbdelbassetDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4703-661X
Shereen H ElsayedDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Sameer AlshehriDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-867X
Bader HuwaimelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-117X
Ahmed AlobaidaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Amal M AlsubaiyelDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraidah 52571, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulsalam A AlqahtaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran 11001, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7243-8042
Mohamed A El HamdDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Al Dwadmi 11961, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-0587
Kumar VenkatesanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.
Kareem M AboRasDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21928, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0485-468X
Mohammed A S AbourehabDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-6567
University of Ha'il · SAAlexandria University · EGKing Khalid University · SANajran University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAQassim University · SASouth Valley University · EGTaif University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient production of solid-dosage oral formulations using eco-friendly supercritical solvents is known as a breakthrough technology towards developing cost-effective therapeutic drugs. Drug solubility is a significant parameter which must be measured before designing the process. Decitabine belongs to the antimetabolite class of chemotherapy agents applied for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In recent years, the prediction of drug solubility by applying mathematical models through artificial intelligence (AI) has become known as an interesting topic due to the high cost of experimental investigations. The purpose of this study is to develop various machine-learning-based models to estimate the optimum solubility of the anti-cancer drug decitabine, to evaluate the effects of pressure and temperature on it. To make models on a small dataset in this research, we used three ensemble methods, Random Forest (RFR), Extra Tree (ETR), and Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT). Different configurations were tested, and optimal hyper-parameters were found. Then, the final models were assessed using standard metrics. RFR, ETR, and GBRT had R2 scores of 0.925, 0.999, and 0.999, respectively. Furthermore, the MAPE metric error rates were 1.423 × 10

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsArtificial IntelligenceDecitabineHumansModels, TheoreticalSolubilityAntineoplastic AgentsDecitabineanti-cancer drugartificial intelligenceoptimizationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID36080444
PMCPMC9457620
OpenAlexW4295084599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.