Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080436›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison of the Characteristics of Recycled Carbon Fibers/Polymer Composites by Different Recycling Techniques.

Kwan-Woo Kim, Dong-Kyu Kim, Woong Han, Byung-Joo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kwan-Woo KimR&D Office 1st, Korea Carbon Industry Promotion Agency, Jeonju 54852, Korea.
Dong-Kyu KimR&D Office 1st, Korea Carbon Industry Promotion Agency, Jeonju 54852, Korea.
Woong HanR&D Office 1st, Korea Carbon Industry Promotion Agency, Jeonju 54852, Korea.
Byung-Joo KimDepartment of Carbon-Nanomaterials Engineering, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-4375

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 20012817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, three recycling methods, namely, mechanical grinding, steam pyrolysis, and the supercritical solvent process, which are used to acquire recycled carbon fibers (RCFs), were compared for their application in synthesizing polymer-matrix composites. RCF-reinforced polyethylene (PE) composites were prepared to compare the mechanical properties of the composites generated using the three recycling methods. The PE/RCF composites exhibited 1.5 times higher mechanical strength than the RCF-reinforced PE composites, probably because of the surface oxidation effects during the recycling processes that consequently enhanced interfacial forces between the RCF and the matrix. Further, the steam pyrolysis process showed the highest energy efficiency and can thus be applied on a large production scale in domestic recycled CF markets.

Indexed as

PolymersSteamCarbon FiberPolyethylenePyrolysisRecyclingCarbon FiberPolyethylenePolymersSteamcarbon fiberscarbon fibers reinforced plasticsrecoveryrecyclingupcycling

Identifiers

PMID36080436
PMCPMC9457743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.