Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36079795›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Individualised Nutritional Care for Disease-Related Malnutrition: Improving Outcomes by Focusing on What Matters to Patients.

Anne Holdoway, Fionna Page, Judy Bauer, Nicola Dervan, Andrea B Maier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patients' Voices and Dietitians' Perspectives on Meaningful Aspects in the Nutritional Care of Patients at Risk of Malnutrition After Stroke.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Gold Standard Home Nasogastric Tube Feeding for Infants and Children.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Navigating Person-Centred Nutrition and Mealtime Care in Rehabilitation: A Conceptual Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anne HoldowayBath Clinic, Circle Health Group, Bath BA2 7BR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-7707
Fionna PageFirst Page Nutrition Ltd., Chippenham SN15 5HS, UK.
Judy BauerDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-5147
Nicola DervanSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, DO4 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3347-4264
Andrea B MaierDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, @AgeAmsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-1724
Bath ClinicMonash University · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivering care that meets patients' preferences, needs and values, and that is safe and effective is key to good-quality healthcare. Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) has profound effects on patients and families, but often what matters to patients is not captured in the research, where the focus is often on measuring the adverse clinical and economic consequences of DRM. Differences in the terminology used to describe care that meets patients' preferences, needs and values confounds the problem. Individualised nutritional care (INC) is nutritional care that is tailored to a patient's specific needs, preferences, values and goals. Four key pillars underpin INC: what matters to patients, shared decision making, evidence informed multi-modal nutritional care and effective monitoring of outcomes. Although INC is incorporated in nutrition guidelines and studies of oral nutritional intervention for DRM in adults, the descriptions and the degree to which it is included varies. Studies in specific patient groups show that INC improves health outcomes. The nutrition care process (NCP) offers a practical model to help healthcare professionals individualise nutritional care. The model can be used by all healthcare disciplines across all healthcare settings. Interdisciplinary team approaches provide nutritional care that delivers on what matters to patients, without increased resources and can be adapted to include INC. This review is of relevance to all involved in the design, delivery and evaluation of nutritional care for all patients, regardless of whether they need first-line nutritional care or complex, highly specialised nutritional care.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNutrition TherapyAdultDelivery of Health CareHumansNutritional SupportQuality of Health Careguidelinesmalnutritionnutritional supportpatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID36079795
PMCPMC9460401
OpenAlexW4293769851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.