Trial reportNutrients2022
Effects of a Novel Amino Acid Formula on Nutritional and Metabolic Status, Anemia and Myocardial Function in Thrice-Weekly Hemodialysis Patients: Results of a Six-Month Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.
Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Frequency Questionnaire to Estimate Dietary Adherence in Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Impacts of amino acid supplementation on renal function and nutritional parameters in patients with renal insufficiency: bibliometric analysis and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Effects of oral nutritional supplements on the nutritional status and inflammatory markers in patients on maintenance dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) induces metabolic derangement of amino acid (AA) kinetics, eliciting severe damage to the protein anabolism. This damage is further intensified by a significant loss of AAs through hemodialysis (HD), affecting all tissues with a high metabolic turnover, such as the myocardium and body muscle mass. (2) Aim: to illustrate the effects of a novel AA mixture in boosting mitochondrial energy production. (3) Methods: A strict selection of 164 dialysis patients was carried out, allowing us to finally identify 22 compliant patients who had not used any form of supplements over the previous year. The study design envisaged a 6-month randomized, double-blind trial for the comparison of two groups of hemodialysis patients: eleven patients (67.2 ± 9.5 years) received the novel AA mix (TRG), whilst the other eleven (68.2 ± 10.5 years) were given a placebo mix that was indistinguishable from the treatment mix (PLG). (4) Results: Despite the 6-month observation period, the following were observed: maintenance of target hemoglobin values with a reduced need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in TRG > 36% compared to PLG (p < 0.02), improved phase angle (PhA) accompanied by an increase in muscle mass solely in the TRG group (p < 0.05), improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF > 67%) in the TRG versus PLG group (p < 0.05) with early but marked signs of improved diastolic function. Increased sensitivity to insulin with greater control of glycemic levels in TRG versus PLG (p = 0.016). (5) Conclusions: the new AA mix seemed to be effective, showing a positive result on nutritional metabolism and cardiac performance, stable hemoglobin levels with the need for lower doses of erythropoietin (EPO), insulin increased cell sensitivity, better muscle metabolism with less loss of mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.