Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36079718›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Caucasian Active Crohn's Disease Patients Undergoing Multidetector CT-Enterography.

Olga Maria Nardone, Andrea Ponsiglione, Roberto de Sire, Giulio Calabrese, Raffaele Liuzzi, Anna Testa, Alessia Dalila Guarino, Oriana Olmo, Antonio Rispo, Luigi Camera and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga Maria NardoneGastroenterology, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9554-4785
Andrea PonsiglioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences-Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0105-935X
Roberto de SireGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-2649
Giulio CalabreseGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Raffaele LiuzziInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (National Research Council), University "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Anna TestaGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-5267
Alessia Dalila GuarinoGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Oriana OlmoGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonio RispoGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luigi CameraDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences-Section of Diagnostic Imaging, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabiana CastiglioneGastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Sarcopenia has a high incidence in Crohn’s disease (CD) with considerable heterogeneity among ethnicities and variable impact on clinical outcomes. Aim: to assess the impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in a cohort of Caucasian patients with active CD undergoing CT-enterography (CTE) for clinical assessment. We further investigated the prevalence of sarcopenia and its predictors. (2) Methods: Caucasian CD patients with moderate−severe clinical activity, who underwent CTE in an emergency setting, were retrospectively recruited. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra was used to detect sarcopenia in the early stages. Clinical malnutrition was defined according to global clinical nutrition criteria. Clinical outcomes included the rate of surgery and infections within one year. (3) Results: A total of 63 CD patients (34 M; aged 44 ± 17 years) were recruited, and 48 patients (68.3%) were sarcopenic. Malnutrition occurred in 28 patients (44.4%) with a significant correlation between body mass index (BMI) and sarcopenia (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). The overall rate of surgery was 33%, without a significant difference between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic (p = 0.41). The rate of infection in patients with sarcopenia was significantly higher than in non-sarcopenic (42%vs15%, p = 0.03). BMI (OR 0.73,95%, CI 0.57−0.93) and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) (OR 19.2 95%, CI 1.05−349.1) were predictive of sarcopenia (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Sarcopenia was associated with an increased rate of infections, and it was observed in 68.3% of the Caucasian cohort with active CD.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseMalnutritionSarcopeniaHumansMuscle, SkeletalRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCrohn’s diseaseCT-enterographymalnutritionsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID36079718
PMCPMC9458031
OpenAlexW4292860115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.