Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36079513›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Properties of 3D Printed Concrete-Geopolymer Hybrids Reinforced with Aramid Roving.

Joanna Marczyk, Celina Ziejewska, Kinga Korniejenko, Michał Łach, Witold Marzec, Mateusz Góra, Paweł Dziura, Andina Sprince, Magdalena Szechyńska-Hebda, Marek Hebda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Let's Print an Ecology in 3D (and 4D).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna MarczykFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3916-4585
Celina ZiejewskaFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6383-7639
Kinga KorniejenkoFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-3982
Michał ŁachFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-9415
Witold MarzecCentrum Ekologicznego Budownictwa Mieszkaniowego 3 Sp. z o.o., Henryka Sienkiewicza 19/4, 40-031 Katowice, Poland.
Mateusz GóraFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0028-5312
Paweł DziuraFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4739-9146
Andina SprinceFaculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, Ķīpsalas iela 6A, Centra Rajons, LV-1048 Rīga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-0873
Magdalena Szechyńska-HebdaPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute, Radzików, 05-870 Błonie, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-6521
Marek HebdaFaculty of Materials Engineering and Physics, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-9459

Funding

National Centre for Research and Development POIR 04.01.04-00-0096/18-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) is an innovative technology that can lead to breakthrough modifications of production processes in the construction industry. The paper presents for the first time the possibility of 3D printing concrete-geopolymer hybrids reinforced with aramid roving. Reference concrete samples and concrete-geopolymer hybrids composed of 95% concrete and 5% geopolymer based on fly ash or metakaolin were produced. The properties of the samples without reinforcement and samples with 0.5% (wt.) aramid roving were compared. The frost resistance tests, UV radiation resistance, and thermal conductivity were evaluated for samples that were 3D-printed or produced by the conventional casting method. Compressive strength tests were carried out for each sample exposed to freeze-thaw cycles and UV radiation. It was observed that after the frost resistance test, the samples produced by the 3D printing technology had a minor decrease in strength properties compared to the samples made by casting. Moreover, the thermal conductivity coefficient was higher for concrete-geopolymer hybrids than concrete reinforced with aramid roving.

Indexed as

3D concrete printing (3DCP)frost resistancegeopolymerhybridsthermal conductivityUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID36079513
PMCPMC9458172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.