ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Separate Calibration of Johnson-Cook Model for Static and Dynamic Compression of a DNAN-Based Melt-Cast Explosive.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Constitutive Description of 5A06 Aluminum Alloy During Warm Deformation Using Machine Learning-Assisted Johnson-Cook Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Calibration of the Karagozian & Case model for compression and tensile tests of a 3,4-dinitropyrazole-based melt-cast explosive.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimization of Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model Parameters Using the Nesterov Gradient-Descent Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When describing the relation between the flow stress and plastic strain of a material under a wide range of strain rates and temperatures, the original Johnson-Cook model generally requires a complicated modification, resulting in a loss of simplicity and clear physical interpretation. In this paper, without modification, the original Johnson-Cook model was calibrated separately for the static and dynamic compression of a DNAN-based melt-cast explosive. The stress-strain curves for static and dynamic compression of this explosive were experimentally measured with a universal testing machine and a split-Hopkinson pressure bar, respectively. Based on the stress-strain curves, the flow stress vs. plastic strain data were extracted and used to calibrate the Johnson-Cook model. The calibration process is described. The parameters for the strain term, strain rate term, and temperature term were fitted sequentially. One set of model parameters was not able to fully describe the relationship between flow stress and plastic strain for both the static and dynamic compression of the DNAN-based melt-cast explosive. Two sets of model parameters were separately calibrated and compared for the static and dynamic compression of this explosive. The effects of the adiabatic temperature rise and the definition of the yield point on this calibration were also investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.