Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36079058›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review.

Vincent De Coninck, Bhaskar Somani, Emre Tarik Sener, Esteban Emiliani, Mariela Corrales, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Amelia Pietropaolo, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Belthangady M Zeeshan Hameed, Francesco Esperto and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A novel bendable suction sheath in flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi.The Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 11 countries.

Vincent De ConinckDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-6478
Emre Tarik SenerYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0085-7680
Esteban EmilianiYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-0022
Mariela CorralesProgressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), 75020 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1461-8464
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
Amelia PietropaoloYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7631-3108
Ioannis MykoniatisYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Belthangady M Zeeshan HameedYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Francesco EspertoYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-1864
Silvia ProiettiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Olivier TraxerService d'Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France.
Etienne Xavier KellerYoung Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
European Association of Urology · NLSorbonne Université · FRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHaukeland University Hospital · NOManipal Academy of Higher Education · INUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Zurich · CHVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are part of urologist's armamentarium when performing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Recently, the world of RIRS has changed dramatically with the development of three game-changers: thulium fiber laser (TFL), smaller size single use digital flexible ureterosopes and intraoperative intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurement devices. We aimed to clarify the impact of UASs on IRP, complications and SFRs and put its indications in perspective of these three major technological improvements. A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed by two authors and relevant studies were selected according to PRISMA guidelines. Recent studies showed that using a UAS lowers IRP and intrarenal temperature by increasing irrigation outflow during RIRS. Data on the impact of a UAS on SFRs, postoperative pain, risk of infectious complications, risk of ureteral strictures and risk of bladder recurrence of urothelial carcinoma after diagnostic RIRS were inconclusive. Prestenting for at least one week resulted in ureteral enlargement, while the influence of pre-operative administration of alpha-blockers was unclear. Since TFL, smaller single use digital ureteroscopes and devices with integrated pressure-measuring and aspiration technology seemed to increase SFRs and decrease pressure and temperature related complications, indications on the use of a UAS may decrease in the near future.

Indexed as

nephrolithiasisretrograde intrarenal surgerysystematic reviewureteral access sheathureteroscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID36079058
PMCPMC9456781
OpenAlexW4294307666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.