ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Platelet-Derived Procoagulant Microvesicles Are Elevated in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO).
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- "ArmedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Increased intraocular inflammation in retinal vein occlusion is independent of circulating immune mediators and is involved in retinal oedema.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of risk prediction models for different subtypes of retinal vein occlusion.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The etiopathogenesis of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is multifactorial, and the contribution of platelets to RVO development has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to analyze platelet function in RVO patients (n = 35) and controls (n = 35). We found a higher (p < 0.05) level of soluble P-selectin in RVO group vs. controls. Additionally, in RVO patients, the concentration of platelet-derived microvesicles was higher (p < 0.05), and the difference between groups was deeper for the fraction of platelet-derived microvesicles with the procoagulant phenotype (p < 0.0001) and for overall procoagulant microvesicles level (p < 0.0001). The results were similar for the total RVO group and for both RVO types (central- and branched-retinal vein occlusion). We did not find differences in simple platelet parameters (platelet count, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platecrit, reticulated platelets) and inflammatory markers (platelet-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio). Similarly, no differences were found for platelet aggregation-stimulated byadenosine diphosphate; collagen; arachidonic acid; and in multiparametric flow cytometry evaluation of P-selectin, PAC-1, and fibrinogen binding for both unstimulated and adenosine diphosphate-, collagen-, and thrombin receptor activating peptide-stimulated platelets. Our results suggest that platelets can contribute to developing RVO by enhancing procoagulant activity through providing a procoagulation surface via platelet-derived microvesicles. The direct role of platelets’ hyperreactivity in developing RVO is less apparent, which is consistent with the complexity and multifactorial background of this disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.