Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36079013›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives on Awake Bruxism Assessment: Expert Consensus Recommendations.

Alessandro Bracci, Frank Lobbezoo, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Anna Colonna, Laura Nykänen, Matteo Pollis, Jari Ahlberg, Daniele Manfredini, International Network For Orofacial Pain And Related Disorders Methodology INfORM

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro BracciDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Frank LobbezooDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9877-7640
Birgitta Häggman-HenriksonDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-3739
Anna ColonnaDepartment of Biomedical Technologies, School of Dentistry, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5869-2068
Laura NykänenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.
Matteo PollisDepartment of Biomedical Technologies, School of Dentistry, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7835-574X
Jari AhlbergDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.
Daniele ManfrediniDepartment of Biomedical Technologies, School of Dentistry, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4352-3085
International Network For Orofacial Pain And Related Disorders Methodology INfORM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake bruxism (AB) is differentiated from sleep bruxism (SB) by the differences in etiology, comorbidities, and consequences related to the different spectrum of muscle activities exerted in relation to the different circadian manifestations. Furthermore, less literature data are available on AB than on SB. The introduction of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) strategies has allowed for collecting valuable data on the frequency of the different activities reported by an individual in his/her natural environment. This strategy has been further improved with the recent use of smartphone technologies. Recent studies have described an average frequency of AB behaviors, within the range of 23-40% for otherwise healthy young adults. An association between AB and some psychological traits has emerged, and the findings have indicated that patients with musculoskeletal symptoms (e.g., temporomandibular joint and/or muscle pain, muscle stiffness, and fatigue) report higher AB frequencies. Preliminary data suggest that muscle bracing and teeth contact are the most commonly reported behaviors, while teeth clenching is much less frequently reported than commonly believed previously. Report of teeth grinding during wakefulness is almost absent. This paper has critically reviewed the currently available approaches for the assessment of AB. In addition, some future perspectives and suggestions for further research have been provided.

Indexed as

awake bruxismbruxismecological momentary assessmentelectromyographymasticatory muscle activityself reportsleep bruxismtemporomandibular disorders

Identifiers

PMID36079013
PMCPMC9457508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.