Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078929›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

A Comparison of the Catheter-Based Transapical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Mitral Paravalvular Leak.

Aleksejus Zorinas, Vilius Janušauskas, Donatas Austys, Giedrius Davidavičius, Lina Puodžiukaitė, Diana Zakarkaitė, Robertas Stasys Samalavičius, Karolis Urbonas, Rita Kramena, Eustaquio Maria Onorato and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksejus ZorinasClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Vilius JanušauskasClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Donatas AustysDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M.K. Čiurlionio 21/27, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-2374-5481
Giedrius DavidavičiusClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Lina PuodžiukaitėClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-1868
Diana ZakarkaitėClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Robertas Stasys SamalavičiusClinic of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Karolis UrbonasClinic of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rita KramenaClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Eustaquio Maria OnoratoCentro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), University School of Milan, Via C. Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6750-5682
Kęstutis RučinskasClinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariskiu 2, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Vilnius University · LTCentro Cardiologico Monzino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of studies where the outcomes of mitral paravalvular leak treatment were compared between surgery and catheter-based closure. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of re-do surgery with transapical catheter-based paravalvular leak closure.

methodsThis is a retrospective observational study at a single institution; 76 patients were included. According to the treatment, two groups were formed: the "Surgical" group (49 patients after re-do surgery) and the "Catheter" group (27 patients after transapical catheter-based treatment).

resultsIn-hospital myocardial infarction occurred in 9 (18%) cases in the "Surgical" group and none in the "Catheter" group,

conclusionsTransapical catheter-based closure of mitral paravalvular leak seems to be a safer treatment procedure than conventional re-do surgery, and the effectiveness of these procedures does not differ.

Indexed as

catheter-based closuremitral paravalvular leakmitral valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID36078929
PMCPMC9457088
OpenAlexW4293217634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.