Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078916›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Safe Performance of Track Dilation and Bile Aspiration with ERCP Catheter in EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy with Plastic Stents: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Ikuhiro Kobori, Yusuke Hashimoto, Taro Shibuki, Kei Okumura, Masanari Sekine, Aki Miyagaki, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Yuichi Takano, Yasumi Katayama, Masaru Kuwada and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ikuhiro KoboriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-9455
Yusuke HashimotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Taro ShibukiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-7691
Kei OkumuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Masanari SekineDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-8804
Aki MiyagakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyooka Hospital, Toyooka 668-8501, Japan.
Yoshihiro SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo 190-0014, Japan.
Yuichi TakanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujigaoka Hospital, Showa University, Yokohama 227-8501, Japan.
Yasumi KatayamaEndoscopy Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.
Masaru KuwadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.
Yoshinori GyotokuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.
Yumi KusanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.
Masaya TamanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndoscopic-ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) with plastic stent placement is associated with a high incidence of adverse events that may be reduced using an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) contrast catheter in the track dilation step. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of track dilation and bile aspiration performed with an ERCP contrast catheter in EUS-HGS with plastic stent placement.

methodsIn a multicenter setting, 22 EUS-HGS cases dilated with an ERCP contrast catheter were analyzed retrospectively and compared between a bile aspiration group and no bile aspiration group.

resultsOverall, adverse events occurred in three (13.6%) cases of bile leakage, three (13.6%) cases of peritonitis, and one (4.5%) case of bleeding. Comparing patients with and without bile aspiration, 6 of the 11 patients (54.5%) with no bile aspiration had adverse events, whereas only 1 of the 11 patients (9.1%) who had bile aspiration, as much bile as possible, had an adverse event (bleeding). In univariate analysis, the only factor affecting the occurrence of adverse events was bile aspiration whenever possible (odds ratio, 12.0; 95%CI 1.12-128.84).

conclusionsIn EUS-HGS with plastic stent placement, track dilation and bile aspiration with an ERCP contrast catheter may be useful in reducing adverse events.

Indexed as

bile aspirationendoscopic ultrasonographyendoscopic-ultrasound-guided biliary drainageendoscopic-ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Identifiers

PMID36078916
PMCPMC9456467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.