ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Exercise Testing in Aortic Stenosis: Safety, Tolerability, Clinical Benefits and Prognostic Value.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian Guideline for Exercise Test in the Adult Population - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Guideline
- The Prognostic Value of Exercise Stress Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Moderate and Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Stress-Derived Hemodynamic and Functional Markers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Integrating Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Systolic blood pressure response during exercise testing in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.Open heart · 2025Observational
- Assessment Regarding the Safety of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Aortic Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- The Changing Complementary Role of Multimodality Imaging in Clinical Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine exercise testing in asymptomatic patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) better classifies the hemodynamic severity of valve stenosis or regurgitation, and describes the symptomatic status and functional capacity of the patient. This is crucial for planned surveillance and optimal timing of surgery, particularly for aortic stenosis (AS), because once symptoms occur, there is a sharp increase in the risk of sudden death unless valve intervention is performed. PURPOSE: To conduct a focused clinical review on the benefits of exercise testing in patients with AS.
methodsThe electronic database PubMed was systematically searched for relevant retrospective and prospective cohort studies reporting on the safety, feasibility and tolerability of exercise testing in VHD, with a special focus on AS. RESULTS AND
conclusionsIn patients with significant AS, exercise testing is safe, feasible and reveals symptoms in a significant proportion of patients. In addition, serial testing has incremental prognostic value over a baseline test alone. Exercise testing in patients with AS is underused and should be performed routinely to refine the hemodynamic severity of AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.