ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Transplantation of Refrozen Ovarian Cortical Strips Retrieved from a Cryopreserved Whole Ovary: Proof of Feasibility.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole ovary cryopreservation and transplantation: a narrative review of technological advances, biological hurdles, and clinical translation in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We report successful clinical outcomes after transplantation of refrozen-rethawed cortical strips from a cryopreserved whole ovary in a patient diagnosed with stage IIIb rectal adenocarcinoma. Whole ovary cryopreservation was proposed as a fertility preservation strategy in 2006 prior to radiotherapy, chemotherapy and oncological surgery. To allow for minimal residual disease screening before ovarian reimplantation, the whole ovary was thawed and dissected into cortical strips. While awaiting the results, the majority of the cortical strips were refrozen. These refrozen-rethawed cortical strips were laparoscopically grafted to 2 sites: the previously irradiated pelvic cavity and the non-irradiated extrapelvic cavity. Ovarian function resumption was assessed by recovery of menses, hormone levels, ultrasound and oocyte pick-up following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Restoration of ovarian function occurred 6 months after reimplantation, with recovery of menses and estradiol secretion. A total of 12 cycles were followed by the IVF department. A second reimplantation was performed 1.5 years later, since the grafts were found to have stopped functioning for >3 consecutive months. Overall, 3 fertilizable oocytes were retrieved transabdominally from the extrapelvic graft following COS, yielding 2 embryos and culminating in one fresh embryo transfer, but no pregnancy. Concerning the reimplantation site, no ovarian activity was detected in the graft placed in the previously irradiated pelvic cavity. Indeed, only fibrotic-looking tissue was observed in the pelvic site at second laparoscopy 1.5 years later, while ovarian activity was noted in the extrapelvic graft, showing a large antral follicle. All in all, transplantation of refrozen-rethawed cortical strips from a cryopreserved whole ovary can lead to ovarian function resumption and embryo development if grafted to a non-irradiated field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.