Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078836›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Between Healthcare Practitioners and Clergy: Evangelicals and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.

Jeanine P D Guidry, Carrie A Miller, Paul B Perrin, Linnea I Laestadius, Gina Zurlo, Matthew W Savage, Michael Stevens, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Candace W Burton, Thomas Gültzow and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanine P D GuidryMedia + Health Lab, Robertson School of Media and Culture, Virginia Commonwealth University, 901 W. Main Street, Suite 2216, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Carrie A MillerDepartment of Public Relations, STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Paul B PerrinSchool of Data Science, Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2070-215X
Linnea I LaestadiusJoseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3272-9317
Gina ZurloGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Hamilton, MA 01982, USA.
Matthew W SavageSchool of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3704-558X
Michael StevensSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Bernard F FuemmelerMassey Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
Candace W BurtonSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-6020
Thomas GültzowDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-1880
Kellie E CarlyleDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary · USMaastricht University · NLSan Diego State University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evangelical Christians are among the most hesitant to get the COVID-19 vaccine. This study examined the extent to which COVID-19 vaccination uptake among Evangelicals is explained by demographic characteristics, Health Belief Model constructs, and faith-based support factors. Survey research firm Qualtrics recruited 531 U.S. adults and conducted a survey to explore predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people who self-identified as Evangelicals in September 2021. A logistic regression showed that those reporting high perceived benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to be vaccinated, while those reporting high perceived barriers were less likely to be vaccinated. Those whose healthcare provider asked them about the vaccine were more likely to be vaccinated than those whose healthcare provider did not ask. Finally, while those who reported information seeking from religious leaders were less likely to be vaccinated, those who reported more faith-based support for vaccination were more likely to be vaccinated. In addition to beliefs about benefits and barriers to vaccination, the role of healthcare providers and clergy were important factors influencing vaccination status. Intervention efforts that capitalize on partnerships between health providers and clergy in supportive congregations may be able to reach undecided Evangelicals.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultClergyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineevangelicalshealth belief modelhealthcare providersvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36078836
PMCPMC9518019
OpenAlexW4294740824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.