Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078652›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Work from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic-The Impact on Employees' Self-Assessed Job Performance.

Claudiu Vasile Kifor, Roxana Florența Săvescu, Raluca Dănuț

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudiu Vasile KiforResearch Center for Sustainable Products and Processes, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550143 Sibiu, Romania.
Roxana Florența SăvescuResearch Center for Sustainable Products and Processes, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550143 Sibiu, Romania.
Raluca DănuțResearch Center for Sustainable Products and Processes, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550143 Sibiu, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-3905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of remote workplace factors on employees' social and technical self-assessed performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the variables belonging to the employee's profile, organizational environment, and work-life balance categories on social and technical performance were analyzed, based on a survey of 801 Romanian employees, using ordinary least squares and quantile regression techniques. While the first method provided summary point estimates that calculated the average effect of the explanatory variables for the "average employee", the second approach allowed us to focus on the effects explanatory variables have on the entire conditional distribution of the response variables, taking into account that this effect can be different for employees with different levels of performance. Job autonomy, engagement, communication skills, trust in co-workers, occupational self-efficacy, and family-work conflict, significantly influence both social and technical performance. PhD education and trust in management significantly influence social performance, while motivation, stress, the share of time spent in remote work, organizational commitment, children in the household, and household size, influence only technical performance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Work PerformanceChildHumansJob SatisfactionPandemicsTeleworkingWorkplaceCOVID-19 pandemicquantile regression analysissocial performancetechnical performancework from home

Identifiers

PMID36078652
PMCPMC9518549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.