Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Promotion of Food and Beverages by German-Speaking Influencers Popular with Adolescents on TikTok, YouTube and Instagram.

Eva Winzer, Brigitte Naderer, Simeon Klein, Leah Lercher, Maria Wakolbinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Media Influencers, Health Literacy, and Food Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Social Media Influences on Dietary Awareness in Children.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva WinzerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-8517
Brigitte NadererDepartment of Media & Communication, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Simeon KleinDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Leah LercherDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Maria WakolbingerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-6700
Medical University of Vienna · ATLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promotion of nutritionally poor food and beverages (F&B) has a proven effect on children's eating preferences and, therefore, plays a significant role in today's childhood obesity epidemic. This study's objective was to assess the prevalence (exposure) and context (power) of the F&B cues in influencer content across three platforms: TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. The selected influencers were popular with adolescents, with a combined total of more than 34 million followers/subscribers. We employed the YouTube Influencer Marketing Protocol from the World Health Organization (WHO) as our basis for coding. We analysed a total of 360 videos/posts and, of these, 24% contained F&B cues, which is equivalent to 18.1 F&B cues/hour. In total, 77% of the cues were not permitted for children's advertising, according to WHO criteria, and this was stable across all platforms, with chocolate and sugary confectionery (23%) as the most frequently featured products. Not-permitted F&B had a four-times higher chance of being branded, a five-times higher chance of being described positively, and received significantly more 'likes'. In 62% of the analysed presentations, the branded product was mentioned, yet only 6% of the content was labelled as advertising. The present analysis delivers further grounds for discussion for policies and regulations of influencer marketing.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesitySocial MediaAdolescentAdvertisingBeveragesChildFoodHumansMarketingadolescentsfood cuesinfluencer food marketingnutritionally poor food

Identifiers

PMID36078625
PMCPMC9518047
OpenAlexW4294151714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.