Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078606›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Activated Porous Carbon Fiber: New Adsorbent for Sampling and Analysis by Thermal Desorption of Siloxanes in Biogas and Biomethane.

Enrico Paris, Pasquale Avino, Ettore Guerriero, Beatrice Vincenti, Adriano Palma, Monica Carnevale, Paolo Benedetti, Marco Torre, Francesco Gallucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrico ParisCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, via della Pascolare 16, Monterotondo, 00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-2870
Pasquale AvinoDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, via de Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-7624
Ettore GuerrieroInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, National Research Council, Rome Research Area-Montelibretti, Monterotondo, 00015 Scalo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-418X
Beatrice VincentiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, via della Pascolare 16, Monterotondo, 00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-5002
Adriano PalmaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, via della Pascolare 16, Monterotondo, 00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-2977
Monica CarnevaleCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, via della Pascolare 16, Monterotondo, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Paolo BenedettiInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, National Research Council, Rome Research Area-Montelibretti, Monterotondo, 00015 Scalo, Italy.
Marco TorreInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, National Research Council, Rome Research Area-Montelibretti, Monterotondo, 00015 Scalo, Italy.
Francesco GallucciCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Center of Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, via della Pascolare 16, Monterotondo, 00015 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4636-8287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing global energy demand requires the continuous development and optimization of the production of alternative energy sources. According to the circular economy approach, waste conversion into biogas and biomethane represent an interesting energy source. The input into the distribution network and energy conversion systems of biomethane requires quality monitoring and the use of cleaning up systems. Therefore, there is a need to constantly invest in the development of sampling and analysis systems that save time, costs, and materials. The purpose of this study was to use activated porous carbon fiber (APCF), an extremely versatile material for sampling and analysis by thermal desorption, to show the advantages it has over the adsorbents traditionally used for siloxane monitoring. Siloxanes are among the contaminating compounds that are mainly present in biogas and biomethane, and if not removed sufficiently, they endanger the quality and use of the gas. These are highly harmful compounds since during combustion, they produce quartz particles that are abrasive to the surfaces of the materials involved in the energy production process. In addition, siloxanes directly hinder the energy properties of biomethane during combustion, due to their radical scavenger properties. In this work, the efficiency of APCF tube was evaluated by comparing it with common multilayer tube thought sampling and analyzing siloxanes in lab scale and in real scale (biogas plant). Thermal desorption analysis coupled with GC-MS for the determination of siloxanes showed that the use of APCF allows to obtain better performance. This allows to deduce that APCF is an innovative material for the establishment of a better sampling and analysis method than the current ones, enabling better results to be achieved in the process of monitoring fuel quality in biomethane production and storage facilities.

Indexed as

BiofuelsSiloxanesCarbon FiberCharcoalPorosityBiofuelsCarbon FiberCharcoalSiloxanesactivated porous carbon fiberbiomethane qualitypollutant monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36078606
PMCPMC9517857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.