Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Why Are We Frequently Ordering Urinalyses in Patients without Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infections in the Emergency Department?

Tessa M Z X K van Horrik, Bart J Laan, Allard B Huizinga, Gercora Hoitinga, Walter P Poortvliet, Suzanne E Geerlings

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tessa M Z X K van HorrikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-226 Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3496-2203
Bart J LaanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-226 Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-8871
Allard B HuizingaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-226 Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gercora HoitingaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Walter P PoortvlietDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Meander MC, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-0801
Suzanne E GeerlingsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-226 Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: In the emergency department (ED), ordering urine tests in patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection can lead to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. We aimed to identify factors contributing to the unnecessary ordering of urinalyses in the ED. (2) Methods: An online survey study among nurses and physicians working in the EDs of five hospitals in the Netherlands was conducted. (3) Results: The overall response rate was 26% (221/850; 85 nurses and 136 physicians). The vast majority of the respondents reported knowing when to order urine tests (197/221; 90%). Almost two-thirds of the respondents (145/221; 66%) agreed that they ordered urinalyses because it is rapid and non-invasive to patients. Most nurses (66/86; 78%) said they informed the doctor if they thought the urine test would not contribute to the patient's diagnosis, but only one-third of the physicians agreed with this statement (44/136; 32%). Most respondents (160/221; 72%) thought guidelines or protocols about urinalyses in the ED would be functional. (4) Conclusions: These results suggest urinalyses were frequently ordered in the ED to achieve a fast work process. Nurses and physicians could improve their communication about the indications for urine tests. Developing diagnostic guidelines for urine testing may be convenient.

Indexed as

UrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRecordsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial stewardshipemergency servicesquality improvementurinalysisurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID36078472
PMCPMC9518362
OpenAlexW4293724591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.