Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078463›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study.

Carey Ann Mather, Christina Cheng, Tracy Douglas, Gerald Elsworth, Richard Osborne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carey Ann MatherInstitute of Health Service Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4301-0028
Christina ChengCentre for Global Health and Equity, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-7689
Tracy DouglasSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7062-5186
Gerald ElsworthCentre for Global Health and Equity, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia.
Richard OsborneCentre for Global Health and Equity, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-2699
Swinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid growth in digital health technologies has increased demand for eHealth literacy of all stakeholders within health and social care environments. The digital future of health care services requires the next generation of health professionals to be well-prepared to confidently provide high-quality and safe health care. The aim of this study was to explore the eHealth literacy of undergraduate health profession students to inform undergraduate curriculum development to promote work-readiness. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken at an Australian university using the seven-domain eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), with 610 students participating. A one-way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) with follow-up univariate analysis (ANOVA) was used to determine if there were differences in eHLQ scores across 11 sociodemographic variables. Students generally had good knowledge of health (Scale 2); however, they had concerns over the security of online health data (Scale 4). There were also significant differences in age and ownership of digital devices. Students who were younger reported higher scores across all seven eHLQ scales than older students. This research provided an understanding of eHealth literacy of health profession students and revealed sub-groups that have lower eHealth literacy, suggesting that digital health skills should be integrated into university curriculums, especially related to practice-based digital applications with special focus to address privacy and security concerns. Preparation of health profession students so they can efficiently address their own needs, and the needs of others, is recommended to minimise the digital divide within health and social care environments.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyStudents, Health OccupationsTelemedicineAustraliaComputer LiteracyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairescurriculumdigitaleHealtheHLQhealth literacyhealth professionstudent

Identifiers

PMID36078463
PMCPMC9518452
OpenAlexW4293724330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.