Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078442›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Exploring Perceptions of a Fresh Food Prescription Program during COVID-19.

Rachel Zimmer, Ashley Strahley, Jane Weiss, Sheena McNeill, Allison S McBride, Scott Best, David Harrison, Kimberly Montez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nutrition and Culinary Education in Food Is Medicine Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. How does fresh food prescribing fit into the social service landscape? A qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel ZimmerDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1037-069X
Ashley StrahleyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Jane WeissBestHealth, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Sheena McNeillDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Allison S McBrideDepartment of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2540-1308
Scott BestH.O.P.E. of Winston Salem, Winston Salem, NC 27106, USA.
David HarrisonNew Communion, Winston Salem, NC 27105, USA.
Kimberly MontezDepartment of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-3664

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study aimed to elicit the perspectives of individuals with food insecurity (FI) who were enrolled in a Fresh Food Prescription (FFRx) delivery program through a collaboration between an academic medical center and multiple community partners in the southeastern United States. Semi-structured interviews and open-ended survey responses explored the experiences of participants enrolled in a FFRx delivery program during the COVID-19 pandemic. The interviews probed the shopping habits, food security, experience, and impact of the program on nutrition, health, and well-being; the surveys explored the perceptions of and satisfaction with the program. A coding scheme was developed inductively, and a thematic analysis was conducted on raw narrative data using Atlas.ti 8.4 to sort and manage the data. The themes included that the program promoted healthy dietary habits, improved access to high-quality foods, improved well-being, enhanced financial well-being, and alleviated logistical barriers to accessing food and cooking. Participants provided suggestions for FFRx improvement. Future studies may facilitate improved clinical-community partnerships to address FI.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food InsecurityFood SupplyHumansPandemicsPrescriptionsCOM-B modelfood accessfood insecurityfood prescriptionhealth promotionolder adultsproduce prescriptionqualitative researchsocial determinants of healthwellness

Identifiers

PMID36078442
PMCPMC9518155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.