Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Developing Graph Convolutional Networks and Mutual Information for Arrhythmic Diagnosis Based on Multichannel ECG Signals.

Bahare Andayeshgar, Fardin Abdali-Mohammadi, Majid Sepahvand, Alireza Daneshkhah, Afshin Almasi, Nader Salari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced Atrial Fibrillation Prediction in ESUS Patients with Hypergraph-based Pre-training.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bahare AndayeshgarDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-5052
Fardin Abdali-MohammadiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Razi University, Kermanshah 6714967346, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-680X
Majid SepahvandDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Razi University, Kermanshah 6714967346, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4451-2054
Alireza DaneshkhahResearch Centre for Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 2JH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7751-4307
Afshin AlmasiClinical Research Development Center, Imam Khomeini and Mohammad Kermanshahi and Farabi Hospitals, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-9087
Nader SalariDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRRazi University · IRCoventry University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases, like arrhythmia, as the leading causes of death in the world, can be automatically diagnosed using an electrocardiogram (ECG). The ECG-based diagnostic has notably resulted in reducing human errors. The main aim of this study is to increase the accuracy of arrhythmia diagnosis and classify various types of arrhythmias in individuals (suffering from cardiovascular diseases) using a novel graph convolutional network (GCN) benefitting from mutual information (MI) indices extracted from the ECG leads. In this research, for the first time, the relationships of 12 ECG leads measured using MI as an adjacency matrix were illustrated by the developed GCN and included in the ECG-based diagnostic method. Cross-validation methods were applied to select both training and testing groups. The proposed methodology was validated in practice by applying it to the large ECG database, recently published by Chapman University. The GCN-MI structure with 15 layers was selected as the best model for the selected database, which illustrates a very high accuracy in classifying different types of rhythms. The classification indicators of sensitivity, precision, specificity, and accuracy for classifying heart rhythm type, using GCN-MI, were computed as 98.45%, 97.89%, 99.85%, and 99.71%, respectively. The results of the present study and its comparison with other studies showed that considering the MI index to measure the relationship between cardiac leads has led to the improvement of GCN performance for detecting and classifying the type of arrhythmias, in comparison to the existing methods. For example, the above classification indicators for the GCN with the identity adjacency matrix (or GCN-Id) were reported to be 68.24%, 72.83%, 95.24%, and 92.68%, respectively.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacDatabases, FactualElectrocardiographyHumansCNNECG-based diagnosticgraph convolutional networksheart arrhythmia typesmutual information

Identifiers

PMID36078423
PMCPMC9518156
OpenAlexW4293676981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.