Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078419›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Impact of Footwear on Occupational Task Performance and Musculoskeletal Injury Risk: A Scoping Review to Inform Tactical Footwear.

Robin Orr, Danny Maupin, Robert Palmer, Elisa F D Canetti, Vini Simas, Ben Schram

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of the injuries caused by occupational footwear.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin OrrTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-8288
Danny MaupinTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0510-6627
Robert PalmerTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.
Elisa F D CanettiTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-398X
Vini SimasTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5797-2917
Ben SchramTactical Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-0488
Bond University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the impact of footwear on worker physical task performance and injury risk. The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews protocol and registered in the Open Science Framework. Key search terms were entered into five academic databases. Following a dedicated screening process and critical appraisal, data from the final articles informing this review were extracted, tabulated, and synthesised. Of 19,614 identified articles, 50 articles informed this review. Representing 16 countries, the most common populations investigated were military and firefighter populations, but a wide range of general occupations (e.g., shipping, mining, hairdressing, and healthcare workers) were represented. Footwear types included work safety boots/shoes (e.g., industrial, gumboots, steel capped, etc.), military and firefighter boots, sports shoes (trainers, tennis, basketball, etc.) and various other types (e.g., sandals, etc.). Occupational footwear was found to impact gait and angular velocities, joint ranges of motion, posture and balance, physiological measures (like aerobic capacity, heart rates, temperatures, etc.), muscle activity, and selected occupational tasks. Occupational footwear associated with injuries included boots, conventional running shoes, shoes with inserts, harder/stiffer outsoles or thin soles, and shoes with low comfort scores-although the findings were mixed. Occupational footwear was also linked to potentially causing injuries directly (e.g., musculoskeletal injuries) as well as leading to mechanisms associated with causing injuries (like tripping and slipping).

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal SystemRunningGaitHumansShoesTask Performance and Analysisinjury preventionwork bootsworker healthworker safetywork shoes

Identifiers

PMID36078419
PMCPMC9518076
OpenAlexW4293537626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.