Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078394›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Concomitant Treatment with Chuna Manual Therapy and Usual Care for Whiplash Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Byung-Jun Kim, A-La Park, Man-Suk Hwang, In Heo, Sun-Young Park, Jae-Heung Cho, Koh-Woon Kim, Jun-Hwan Lee, In-Hyuk Ha, Kyoung-Sun Park and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Byung-Jun KimSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.
A-La ParkCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-4874
Man-Suk HwangSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.
In HeoSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-8917
Sun-Young ParkSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-1612
Jae-Heung ChoDepartment of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.
Koh-Woon KimDepartment of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea.
Jun-Hwan LeeClinical Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5730-6869
In-Hyuk HaDepartment of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul 02453, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5020-6723
Kyoung-Sun ParkDepartment of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul 02453, Korea.
Eui-Hyoung HwangSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.
Byung-Cheul ShinSchool of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0059-2689
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRJaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine · KRKyung Hee University · KRKorea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KRLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Chuna manual therapy combined with usual care to those of usual care alone for treating whiplash injuries.

designA two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, multicenter pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

settingThree hospitals in Korea.

participantsOverall, 132 participants between 19 and 70 years of age, involved in traffic accidents and treated at three hospitals in Korea, >2 but <13 weeks prior to enrollment, with neck pain consistent with whiplash-associated disorder grades I and II and a numeric rating scale score ≥5 were included.

interventionsParticipants were equally and randomly allocated to the Chuna manual therapy and usual care ( PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of days to achieve a 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes included areas under the 50% numeric rating scale reduction curve: pain, disability, quality of life, and safety.

resultsThe Chuna manual therapy + usual care group (23.31 ± 21.36 days;

conclusionsIn patients with subacute whiplash injury, Chuna manual therapy showed a rapid rate of recovery, high effectiveness, and safety.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsWhiplash InjuriesHumansInfant, NewbornNeck PainPain MeasurementQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeChuna manual therapycomparative effectivenessKorean medicinemulticenter pragmatic randomized controlled trialwhiplash injury

Identifiers

PMID36078394
PMCPMC9518174
OpenAlexW4293538011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.