Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078357›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Inês Francisco, Gregory S Antonarakis, Francisco Caramelo, Anabela Baptista Paula, Carlos Miguel Marto, Eunice Carrilho, Maria Helena Fernandes, Francisco Vale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inês FranciscoInstitute of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3283-5104
Gregory S AntonarakisDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6741-6922
Francisco CarameloCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0015-8604
Anabela Baptista PaulaInstitute of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6154-4173
Carlos Miguel MartoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9269-5417
Eunice CarrilhoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-5557
Maria Helena FernandesFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-393 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-9574
Francisco ValeInstitute of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2615-2929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey to investigate several aspects, i.e., provider characteristics, patient profile, services offered, and treatment protocols and complications. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between categorical variables was performed using Fisher's exact test. The significance level chosen was 0.05. A total of 69 individuals from 23 European countries completed the survey. Centralized care was the preferred system, and the majority of the countries have an association for cleft patients and professionals (53.6%). The largest percentage of patients was seen in the university hospital environment (Fisher's exact test

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateOral Surgical ProceduresCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumanscleft lipcleft palatehealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID36078357
PMCPMC9518109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.