Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36078353›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Moral Distress Scores of Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units for Adults Using Corley's Scale: A Systematic Review.

Noemi Giannetta, Giulia Villa, Loris Bonetti, Sara Dionisi, Andrea Pozza, Stefano Rolandi, Debora Rosa, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [When the one who heals dies. The physician at the end of life].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noemi GiannettaSchool of Nursing, UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-1898
Giulia VillaCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7429-0504
Loris BonettiDepartment of Nursing, Nursing Research Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0694-0880
Sara DionisiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Andrea PozzaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Stefano RolandiIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Debora RosaDepartment of Cardiovascular, Neural, and Metabolic Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1440-3092
Duilio Fiorenzo ManaraCenter for Nursing Research and Innovation, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5182-6994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo systematic review in the literature has analyzed the intensity and frequency of moral distress among ICU nurses. No study seems to have mapped the leading personal and professional characteristics associated with high levels of moral distress. This systematic review aimed to describe the intensity and frequency of moral distress experienced by nurses in ICUs, as assessed by Corley's instruments on moral distress (the Moral Distress Scale and the Moral Distress Scale-Revised). Additionally, this systematic review aimed to summarize the correlates of moral distress.

methodsA systematic search and review were performed using the following databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), and Psychological Abstracts Information Services (PsycINFO). The review methodology followed PRISMA guidelines. The quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

resultsFindings showed a moderate level of moral distress among nurses working in ICUs. The findings of this systematic review confirm that there are a lot of triggers of moral distress related to patient-level factors, unit/team-level factors, or system-level causes. Beyond the triggers of moral distress, this systematic review showed some correlates of moral distress: those nurses working in ICUs with less work experience and those who are younger, female, and intend to leave their jobs have higher levels of moral distress. This systematic review's findings show a positive correlation between professional autonomy, empowerment, and moral distress scores. Additionally, nurses who feel supported by head nurses report lower moral distress scores.

conclusionsThis review could help better identify which professionals are at a higher risk of experiencing moral distress, allowing the early detection of those at risk of moral distress, and giving the organization some tools to implement preventive strategies.

Indexed as

MoralsNursesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairesethical conflicthealth professionalsmoral couragemoral distressnursesnursingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36078353
PMCPMC9517876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.