ArticleCells2022
Rule-Based Pruning and In Silico Identification of Essential Proteins in Yeast PPIN.
Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins are vital for the significant cellular activities of living organisms. However, not all of them are essential. Identifying essential proteins through different biological experiments is relatively more laborious and time-consuming than the computational approaches used in recent times. However, practical implementation of conventional scientific methods sometimes becomes challenging due to poor performance impact in specific scenarios. Thus, more developed and efficient computational prediction models are required for essential protein identification. An effective methodology is proposed in this research, capable of predicting essential proteins in a refined yeast protein-protein interaction network (PPIN). The rule-based refinement is done using protein complex and local interaction density information derived from the neighborhood properties of proteins in the network. Identification and pruning of non-essential proteins are equally crucial here. In the initial phase, careful assessment is performed by applying node and edge weights to identify and discard the non-essential proteins from the interaction network. Three cut-off levels are considered for each node and edge weight for pruning the non-essential proteins. Once the PPIN has been filtered out, the second phase starts with two centralities-based approaches: (1) local interaction density (LID) and (2) local interaction density with protein complex (LIDC), which are successively implemented to identify the essential proteins in the yeast PPIN. Our proposed methodology achieves better performance in comparison to the existing state-of-the-art techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.