Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077971›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies.

Shuolei Chen, Zhuoran Wu, Ole Russell Sleipness, Hao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating Dog Preference Between Artificial and Natural Turf Grasses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuolei ChenCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4891-4077
Zhuoran WuCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Ole Russell SleipnessDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA.
Hao WangCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Nanjing Forestry University · CNUtah State University · US

Funding

College Students' Innovative Entrepreneurial Training 202210298047ZJiangsu Social Science Institutes 2022SJYB0127National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFD1100404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dog ownership and dog walking brings various health benefits for urban dwellers, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, but trigger a number of controversies. Dog parks have become increasingly significant public resources in the pandemic to support these benefits while facing intense conflicts. To develop effective dog parks in urban settings, growing numbers of scholars have provided insights into the design and management strategies for addressing the benefits and conflicts. The objective of this study is to synthesize and analyze various aspects of dog park design and management and to assess identified strategies for enhancing their benefits while mitigating their drawbacks. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic study was conducted to synthesize the benefits, conflicts, and management strategies of dog parks, supported by Citespace. Benefits and conflicts in dog park design and management have been synthesized and organized according to their frequency of presence and the statistical results. We analyzed and assessed existing design and management strategies. Through this systematic study, we discovered the need obtain o po experimental evidence on effective dog park design and management to enhance their benefits while mitigating their sources of conflict and limitations in the intensity of park visitors' physical activity in off-leash areas. Guidelines for the design and management strategies for effective dog parks were made to enhance their benefits while alleviating conflicts in the future development of sustainable dog parks that promote healthy relationships between canines and residents in urban built environments.

Indexed as

dog ownershipdog parkdog walkinghealth benefitsoff-leash areaphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID36077971
PMCPMC9455081
OpenAlexW4294343808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.