Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077970›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Influence of

Luis Vargas-Ortiz, Veronica Andrade-Yucailla, Marcos Barros-Rodríguez, Raciel Lima-Orozco, Edis Macías-Rodríguez, Katherine Contreras-Barros, Carlos Guishca-Cunuhay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of enteric methane production in dairy cows fedJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Vargas-OrtizDepartamento de Producción Animal, Instituto Superior Tecnológico Benjamín Araujo, Patate 180403, Ecuador.
Veronica Andrade-YucaillaCentro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena, La Libertad 240204, Ecuador.
Marcos Barros-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Sector el Tambo-La Universidad, vía a Quero, Cevallos 1801334, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-9608-5912
Raciel Lima-OrozcoCentro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas, Santa Clara 50100, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0002-9278-6076
Edis Macías-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo 130701, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1113-3031
Katherine Contreras-BarrosFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Campus El Dorado-Itchimbía, Quito 170403, Ecuador.
Carlos Guishca-CunuhayFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Sector el Tambo-La Universidad, vía a Quero, Cevallos 1801334, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-1215
Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de las Villas (UCLV) · CUUniversidad Técnica de Ambato · ECCentral University of Ecuador · ECUniversidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena · ECUniversidad Técnica de Manabí · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the worrying generation of GHG from ruminant production has generated widespread interest in exploring nutritional strategies focused on reducing these gases, presenting the use of bioactive compounds (tannins) as an alternative in the diet. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of the addition of different levels of Acacia mearnsii on ruminal degradation, nutrient digestibility, and mitigation of greenhouse gas production. A completely randomized design with four treatments and six repetitions was used. The treatments were: T1, T2, T3, and T4 diets with, respectively, 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% A. mearnsii. The rumen degradation kinetic and in vitro digestibility, and the production of gas, CH4, and CO2 were evaluated. In situ rumen degradation and in vitro digestibility of DM and OM showed differences between treatments, with T1 being higher (p < 0.05) in the degradation of the soluble fraction (A), potential degradation (A + B), and effective degradation for the different passage rates in percent hour (0.02, 0.05, and 0.08), compared to the other treatments. Rumen pH did not show differences (p > 0.05) between treatments. The lowest (p < 0.05) gas, CH4, and CO2 production was observed in treatments T1 and T2 with an approximate mean of 354.5 mL gas/0.500 g fermented DM, 36.5 mL CH4/0.500 g fermented DM, and 151.5 mL CO2/0.500 g fermented DM, respectively, compared to treatments T3 and T4. Under the conditions of this study, it was concluded that it is possible to replace traditional forages with up to 20% of A. mearnsii, without observing changes in the production of greenhouse gases with respect to the control treatment (0% of A. mearnsii); however, A. mearnsii is not usable because it significantly decreases rumen degradability of DM and OM, which would considerably affect the production in animals.

Indexed as

acacia mearnsiimethanerumen degradationtannin

Identifiers

PMID36077970
PMCPMC9454763
OpenAlexW4294343995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.