Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077931›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Robin Who? Bird Species Knowledge of German Adults.

Pirmin Enzensberger, Benjamin Schmid, Thomas Gerl, Volker Zahner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pirmin EnzensbergerFaculty of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Benjamin SchmidFaculty of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Thomas GerlInstitute for Biology Education, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, 80797 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7608-8270
Volker ZahnerFaculty of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Funding

Bayerischer Naturschutzfonds NF8-N4510-2020/2-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of species is the basis for involvement in biodiversity awareness and protection. For the first time, we investigated how bird species knowledge is spread among adults in Germany in a representative study. It was shown that of the 15 species presented, only 6 were recognized on average, and 4.5% of the tested persons did not recognize any species at all. Only 0.5% knew all presented species. Younger participants in particular knew significantly fewer species than the group over 60 years. We also tested if species knowledge has an impact on the motivation to act for nature conservation. In this study, knowledge of species correlated directly with the willingness to take action for species protection, e.g., through donating money for proactive nature conservation. Simply being in nature was meaningless for the test result. However, if one was actively involved with birds, e.g., via bird counts or bird feeding, species knowledge was significantly better.

Indexed as

biological educationbird species knowledgeconnectiveness with naturerepresentative surveyspecies identification skills

Identifiers

PMID36077931
PMCPMC9454614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.