Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077909›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of Essential Oil Blends on In Vitro Apparent and Truly Degradable Dry Matter, Efficiency of Microbial Production, Total Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Two Dairy Cow Diets.

Rosetta M Brice, Peter A Dele, Kelechi A Ike, Yasmine A Shaw, Lydia K Olagunju, Oluteru E Orimaye, Kiran Subedi, Uchenna Y Anele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects of the Incubation Period ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosetta M BriceDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Peter A DeleDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Kelechi A IkeDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Yasmine A ShawDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Lydia K OlagunjuDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Oluteru E OrimayeDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Kiran SubediAnalytical Services Laboratory, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-3554
Uchenna Y AneleDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · USAnalytical Services · US

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture Evans Allen Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study evaluated nine essential oil blends (EOBs) for their effects on ruminal in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), efficiency of microbial production, total short-chain fatty acid concentration (SCFA), total gas, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using two dietary substrates (high forage and high concentrate). The study was arranged as a 2 × 2 × 9 + 1 factorial design to evaluate the effects of the nine EOBs on the two dietary substrates at two time points (6 and 24 h). The inclusion levels of the EOBs were 0 µL (control) and 100 µL with three laboratory replicates. Substrate × EOBs × time interactions were not significant (p > 0.05) for total gas and greenhouse gas emissions. The inclusion of EOBs in the diets resulted in a reduction (p < 0.001) in GHG emissions, except for EOB1 and EOB8 in the high concentrate diet at 6 h and for EOB8 in the high forage diet at 24 h of incubation. Diet type had no effect on apparent IVDMD (IVADMD) whereas the inclusion of EOBs reduced (p < 0.05) IVADMD with higher values noted for the control treatment. The efficiency of microbial production was greater (p < 0.001) for EOB treatments except for EOB1 inclusion in the high forage diet. The inclusion of EOBs affected (p < 0.001) the total and molar proportion of volatile fatty acid concentrations. Overall, the inclusion of the EOBs modified the rumen function resulting in improved efficiency of microbial production. Both the apparent and truly degraded DM was reduced in the EOB treatments. The inclusion of EOBs also resulted in reduced GHG emissions in both diets, except for EOB8 in the high forage diet which was slightly higher than the control treatment.

Indexed as

corn silagefeed efficiencyplant nutraceuticalsruminant nutritiontotal mixed ration

Identifiers

PMID36077909
PMCPMC9454440
OpenAlexW4293106343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.