Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077891›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Net Conversion of Human-Edible Vitamins and Minerals in the U.S. Southern Great Plains Beef Production System.

Phillip A Lancaster, Deann Presley, Walt Fick, Dustin Pendell, Adam Ahlers, Andrew Ricketts, Minfeng Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phillip A LancasterBeef Cattle Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-6065
Deann PresleyDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-0347
Walt FickDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Dustin PendellDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Adam AhlersDepartment of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Andrew RickettsDepartment of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Minfeng TangBeef Cattle Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

US Beef Checkoff 1850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beef is a good source of several vitamins and minerals but data on the net contribution to the human diet is lacking. The objective was to quantify the net nutrient contribution of the beef supply chain to provide vitamins and minerals to the human diet. Beef cattle production parameters for the beef supply chain were as described by Baber et al., 2018 with the red and organ meat yield from each production segment estimated using literature values of serially-harvested beef cattle. Nutrient concentration of feeds was acquired from feed composition tables in nutrient requirement texts, and the nutrient concentration of beef and organ meats was based on 2018 USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. The nutrient absorption coefficients of feeds, red meat, and organs were acquired from the literature. The human-edible conversion ratio was >1.0 for phosphorus when only red meat yield was considered indicating that the beef supply chain produced more human-edible phosphorus than it consumed. When organ meats were included, riboflavin, niacin, choline, and phosphorus had conversion ratios >1.0. After adjusting for the absorption of nutrients, the beef supply chain was a net contributor of niacin and phosphorus in the human diet when accounting for red meat yield only, but when including organ meats, iron, riboflavin, and choline also had conversion ratios >1.0. The maximum proportion of corn in the corn grain plus distillers’ grains component of the feedlot diets for the absorbable conversion ratio to be ≥1 ranged from 8.34 to 100.00% when only red meat yield was considered and from 32.02 to 100.00% when red and organ meats were considered. In conclusion, the current beef production system in the Southern Great Plains produces more human-absorbable iron, phosphorus, riboflavin, niacin, and choline to the human diet than is consumed in the beef supply chain.

Indexed as

beeffood systemnet contributionsustainableupcycling

Identifiers

PMID36077891
PMCPMC9454978
OpenAlexW4293009348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.