Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077866›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Comparing Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and FNCLCC Grading to Improve Pretreatment Grading of Soft Tissue Sarcoma-A Translational Feasibility Study on Fusion Imaging.

Madelaine Hettler, Julia Kitz, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Manuel Guhlich, Babak Panahi, Jennifer Ernst, Lena-Christin Conradi, Michael Ghadimi, Philipp Ströbel, Jens Jakob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Madelaine HettlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9728-2494
Julia KitzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Ali Seif Amir HosseiniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Manuel GuhlichDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Babak PanahiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Jennifer ErnstDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Lena-Christin ConradiDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-1018
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Philipp StröbelInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Jens JakobDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histological subtype and grading are cornerstones of treatment decisions in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Due to intratumoral heterogeneity, pretreatment grading assessment is frequently unreliable and may be improved through functional imaging. In this pilot study, 12 patients with histologically confirmed STS were included. Preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging was fused with a computed tomography scan of the resected specimen after collecting core needle biopsies and placing radiopaque markers at distinct tumor sites. The Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) grading criteria of the biopsies and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the biopsy sites were correlated. Concordance in grading between the specimen and at least one biopsy was achieved in 9 of 11 cases (81.8%). In 7 of 12 cases, fusion imaging was feasible without relevant contour deviation. Functional analysis revealed a tendency for high-grade regions (Grade 2/3 (G2/G3)) (median (range) ± standard deviation: 1.13 (0.78-1.70) ± 0.23 × 10

Indexed as

ADCcore needle biopsyfunctional imagingMRItumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID36077866
PMCPMC9454612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.