Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077847›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

The Therapeutic Role of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Interdisciplinary Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in Germany-Cross-Sectional Results of a Prospective Nationwide Observational Study (PROSa).

Benjamin Thomas, Amir K Bigdeli, Steffen Nolte, Emre Gazyakan, Leila Harhaus, Oliver Bischel, Burkhard Lehner, Gerlinde Egerer, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Peter Hohenberger and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Orthoplastic Approach in Adult Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Plastic and reconstructive surgery in spinal sarcoma resection: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin ThomasDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4185-178X
Amir K BigdeliDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-5132
Steffen NolteDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Emre GazyakanDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2826-2793
Leila HarhausDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7061-0512
Oliver BischelDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedics, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-3908
Burkhard LehnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerlinde EgererDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Gunhild MechtersheimerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter HohenbergerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-5923
Raymund E HorchDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-2353
Dimosthenis AndreouDepartment of General Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-9678
Jochen SchmittNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Markus K SchulerClinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Martin EichlerNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9654-2207
Ulrich KneserDepartment of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3402-2860
Heidelberg University · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

German Cancer Aid 111713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the involvement of plastic surgery has been deemed important in the treatment of sarcoma patients to avoid oncological compromises and ameliorate patient outcomes, it is not ubiquitously available. The accessibility of defect reconstruction and its therapeutic impact on sarcoma care is the subject of this analysis. Cross-sectional data from 1309 sarcoma patients were collected electronically at 39 German study centers from 2017 to 2019. A total of 621 patients with surgical treatment for non-visceral soft-tissue sarcomas were included. The associated factors were analyzed exploratively using multifactorial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of successful defect reconstruction, as well Chi-squared and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests to evaluate subgroups, including limb-salvage rates in extremity cases. A total of 76 patients received reconstructive surgery, including 52 local/pedicled versus 24 free flaps. Sarcomas with positive margins upon first resection (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.2-4.4) that were excised at centers with lower degrees of specialization (OR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.2-4.2) were independently associated with the need for post-oncological defect coverage. In this context, the inhouse availability of plastic surgery (OR = 3.0, 95%CI = 1.6-5.5) was the strongest independent predictor for successful flap-based reconstruction, which in turn was associated with significantly higher limb-salvage rates (OR = 1.4, 95%CI = 1.0-2.1) in cases of extremity sarcomas (

Indexed as

defectmicrosurgeryplastic surgeryreconstructionreconstructive surgerysarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36077847
PMCPMC9454490
OpenAlexW4294862359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.