Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077795›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Can HER2 1+ Breast Cancer Be Considered as HER2-Low Tumor? A Comparison of Clinicopathological Features, Quantitative HER2 mRNA Levels, and Prognosis among HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Lan Shu, Yiwei Tong, Zhuoxuan Li, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Overexpression of cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein 1 as a biomarker for the prognosis and selection of postoperative regimen in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The impact of HER2-low status on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically HER2-negative breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lan ShuDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yiwei TongDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-9095
Zhuoxuan LiDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Xiaosong ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Kunwei ShenDepartment of General Surgery, Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772797, 82072937Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21YF1427400Shanghai Municipal Education Commission 20172007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low tumor is a new entity defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative. We aimed to evaluate whether HER2 mRNA levels tested by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) could better define HER2-low tumors. Patients and methods: Consecutive breast cancer patients with hormonal receptor-positive, HER2-negative diseases, and HER2 mRNA results were included. Clinicopathologic features, HER2 mRNA expression level, and prognosis were compared among HER2 0, 1+ and 2+/FISH− groups. Concordance of the HER2 category between qRT-PCR and IHC/FISH was analyzed for each group. Results: 2296 patients were included: 368 (16.0%) HER2 0, 911 (39.7%) 1+, and 1017 (44.3%) 2+/FISH− tumors. HER2 1+ cases shared similarities with HER2 0 tumors in terms of clinicopathologic features (all p > 0.05), whereas IHC 2+/FISH− cases were less often non-IDC (p = 0.045), node-negative (p = 0.044), and Ki-67 < 14% (p <0.001). The mRNA expression was similar between HER2 0 and 1+ cases (p = 0.063), and both were lower than 2+/FISH− cases (p < 0.001). A poor concordance rate was found between IHC/FISH and qRT-PCR for HER2 0 and HER2-low cases (Cohen’s kappa 0.126, p < 0.001). No survival difference was observed among these groups, whether stratified by HER2 IHC/FISH status or mRNA level (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: HER2 1+ cases had similar clinicopathological features to HER2 0 breast cancers, and both were different from HER2 2+/FISH− cases. HER2 mRNA levels were comparable between HER2 0 and 1+ tumors, and both were significantly lower than IHC 2+/FISH− tumors. Neither IHC nor qRT-PCR may be optimal to quantify HER2-low expression, especially for HER2 1+ patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerHER2-lowimmunohistochemistrymRNA levelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36077795
PMCPMC9455006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.