Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077710›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Clinical Utility of Prostate Health Index for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions.

Chung-Un Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Jae-Hoon Chung, Minyong Kang, Hyun-Hwan Sung, Hwang-Gyun Jeon, Byong-Chang Jeong, Seong-Il Seo, Seong-Soo Jeon, Hyun-Moo Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chung-Un LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-0405
Sang-Min LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Jae-Hoon ChungDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Minyong KangDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Hyun-Hwan SungDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Hwang-Gyun JeonDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Byong-Chang JeongDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Seong-Il SeoDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Seong-Soo JeonDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Hyun-Moo LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Wan SongDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADSv2) score-3 lesions is equivocal; it is regarded as an intermediate status of presented PCa. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of the prostate health index (PHI) for the diagnosis of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in patients with PI-RADSv2 score-3 lesions. The study cohort included patients who underwent a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, cognitive-targeted biopsy for PI-RADSv2 score-3 lesions between November 2018 and April 2021. Before prostate biopsy, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) derivatives, such as total PSA (tPSA), [-2] proPSA (p2PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were determined. The calculation equation of PHI is as follows: [(p2PSA/fPSA) × tPSA ½]. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the values of PSA derivatives measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were compared. For this study, csPCa was defined as Gleason grade 2 or higher. Of the 392 patients with PI-RADSv2 score-3 lesions, PCa was confirmed in 121 (30.9%) patients, including 59 (15.1%) confirmed to have csPCa. Of all the PSA derivatives, PHI and PSA density (PSAD) showed better performance in predicting overall PCa and csPCa, compared with PSA (all p < 0.05). The AUC of the PHI for predicting overall PCa and csPCa were 0.807 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.710−0.906, p = 0.001) and 0.819 (95% CI: 0.723−0.922, p < 0.001), respectively. By the threshold of 30, PHI was 91.7% sensitive and 46.1% specific for overall PCa, and was 100% sensitive for csPCa. Using 30 as a threshold for PHI, 34.4% of unnecessary biopsies could have been avoided, at the cost of 8.3% of overall PCa, but would include all csPCa.

Indexed as

multiparametric magnetic resonance imagingprostate cancerprostate health indexprostate imaging reporting and data system

Identifiers

PMID36077710
PMCPMC9454669
OpenAlexW4293528061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.