Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077680›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in France: A National Survey among Vascular Disease and Supportive Care Specialists.

Isabelle Mahé, Céline Chapelle, Ludovic Plaisance, Laurent Bertoletti, Patrick Mismetti, Didier Mayeur, Guillaume Mahé, Francis Couturaud, AFSOS, SFMV and INNOVTE

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle MahéUniversité Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-7880
Céline ChapelleUnité de Recherche Clinique Innovation et Pharmacologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, 42270 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3281-3666
Ludovic PlaisanceUniversité Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France.
Laurent BertolettiINNOVTE-FCRIN (Investigation Network On Venous Thrombo-Embolism), 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-3010
Patrick MismettiINNOVTE-FCRIN (Investigation Network On Venous Thrombo-Embolism), 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.
Didier MayeurOncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1, Rue Professeur Marion, BP77980, CEDEX, 21079 Dijon, France.
Guillaume MahéUnité de Médecine Vasculaire, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France.
Francis CouturaudINNOVTE-FCRIN (Investigation Network On Venous Thrombo-Embolism), 42055 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1855-8032
AFSOS, SFMV and INNOVTE
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Bayer (France) none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are recommended by international guidelines for at least 6 months in patients with cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proposed as an alternative to LMWH. In clinical practice, the specialists in charge of CAT have to decide which anticoagulant to prescribe. An electronic survey tool, including vignettes and questions, was sent to members of the French Society of Vascular Medicine, the French-speaking association for supportive care in oncology and the Investigation Network On Venous Thrombo-Embolism. Among the 376 respondents, LMWHs were reported as the first choice by most specialists. The prescription of DOACs within the first 3 weeks of CAT diagnosis was highly dependent on the cancer site: 5.9%, 18.6% and 24.5% in patients with locally advanced colorectal, lung and breast cancer, respectively. The determinants were mostly related to cancer (site and stage or evolution) and to anticancer treatments. For 61% of physicians, some anticancer treatments were contraindications to DOACs. However, almost 90% of physicians considered switching to DOAC after a median 3-month period of LMWHs. In daily practice, LMWHs and DOACs are now considered by specialists of CAT; the decision is mostly driven by the site of cancer. The role of anticancer treatments in the decision remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

anticoagulantscancersurveytreatment guidelinesvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36077680
PMCPMC9454850
OpenAlexW4293659890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.