Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077654›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Effect of Smoking on Treatment Efficacy and Toxicity in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marie Bergman, Georgios Fountoukidis, Daniel Smith, Johan Ahlgren, Mats Lambe, Antonios Valachis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring Gender Differences in Receipt of the 5As for Smoking Cessation for Recently Diagnosed Cancer Patients (ECOG-ACRIN EAQ171CD).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. [Suspicion of sarcopenia as a predictor of toxicity in older people with cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The impact of smoking on lung cancer patients.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie BergmanDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Karlstad, 652 30 Karlstad, Sweden.
Georgios FountoukidisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Daniel SmithClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Johan AhlgrenRegional Cancer Centre, Mid-Sweden Health Care Region, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats LambeRegional Cancer Centre, Mid-Sweden Health Care Region, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Antonios ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEKarlstad University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Läkare mot tobak/Doctors against Tobacco NARegional Cancer Centre, Mid-Sweden Health Care Region NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the current evidence on the potential impact of smoking during cancer treatment on treatment efficacy and toxicity irrespective of cancer type.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed using two electronic databases for potentially eligible studies. Only studies based on multivariable analysis for the association between smoking, compared to non-smokers (never or former), and treatment efficacy or toxicity were included. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) or Odds Ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were estimated through random-effects meta-analyses.

resultsIn total, 97 eligible studies were identified, of which 79 were eligible for the pooled analyses. Smoking during radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, was associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence (pooled HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.28-1.91 for radiation therapy; pooled HR: 4.28; 95% CI: 2.06-8.90 for chemoradiotherapy) and worse disease-free survival (pooled HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.21-2.90 for radiation therapy; pooled HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.41-2.62 for chemoradiotherapy) as well as a higher risk for radiation-induced toxicity (pooled OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.32-2.56 for radiation therapy; pooled OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.43-4.07 for chemoradiotherapy) with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. Smoking during treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with lung cancer was associated with worse progression-free survival compared to non-smokers (pooled HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.14-1.80; moderate certainty of evidence), whereas smoking was associated with improved progression-free survival in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.84; moderate certainty of evidence). No statistically significant associations were observed between smoking and treatment efficacy or toxicity to chemotherapy.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis confirms earlier evidence of the negative impact of smoking during radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, on treatment efficacy and radiation-induced toxicity as well as a negative impact of smoking on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs and a positive impact on the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors. The evidence is too weak to draw firm conclusions on the potential association between smoking and chemotherapy, whereas there is no evidence for pooled analyses regarding other types of systemic oncological therapy.

Indexed as

cancerefficacymeta-analysissmokingtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36077654
PMCPMC9454993
OpenAlexW4293103544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.