Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077477›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): An Overview of the Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Actions and Effects on Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.

Pei-Qi Lim, I-Hung Han, Kok-Min Seow, Kuo-Hu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Innovative landscapes in intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pei-Qi LimDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei 231, Taiwan.
I-Hung HanDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei 231, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-3788
Kok-Min SeowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111, Taiwan.
Kuo-Hu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei 231, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4758-0351
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTzu Chi University · TW

Funding

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital TCRD-TPE-111-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are at advanced stages (stage III-IV), for which the recurrence rate is high and the 5-year survival rate is low. The most effective treatment for advanced diseases involves a debulking surgery followed by adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Nevertheless, systemic treatment with intravenous chemotherapeutic agents for peritoneal metastasis appears to be less effective due to the poor blood supply to the peritoneal surface with low drug penetration into tumor nodules. Based on this reason, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) emerges as a new therapeutic alternative. By convection and diffusion, the hyperthermic chemotherapeutic agents can directly contact intraperitoneal tumors and produce cytotoxicity. In a two-compartment model, the peritoneal-plasma barrier blocks the leakage of chemotherapeutic agents from peritoneal cavity and tumor tissues to local vessels, thus maintaining a higher concentration of chemotherapeutic agents within the tumor tissues to facilitate tumor apoptosis and a lower concentration of chemotherapeutic agents within the local vessels to decrease systemic toxicity. In this review, we discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms of HIPEC actions and the effects on EOCs, including the progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For primary advanced ovarian cancers, more studies are agreeing that patients undergoing HIPEC have better surgical and clinical (PFS; OS) outcomes than those not, although one study reported no differences in the PFS and OS. For recurrent ovarian cancers, studies have revealed better DFS and OS in patients undergoing HIPEC than those in patients not undergoing HIPEC, although one study reported no differences in the PFS. HIPEC appears comparable to traditional intravenous chemotherapy in treating advanced EOCs. Overall, HIPEC has demonstrated some therapeutic benefits in many randomized phase III trials when combined with the standard cytoreductive surgeries for advanced EOCs. Nevertheless, many unknown aspects of HIPEC, including detailed mechanisms of actions, along with the effectiveness and safety for the treatment of EOCs, warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHyperthermia, InducedOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic AgentsHIPEChyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyovarian cancersurvival

Identifiers

PMID36077477
PMCPMC9456527
OpenAlexW4294733467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.