ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Activity Screening of Fatty Acid Mimetic Drugs Identified Nuclear Receptor Agonists.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Introduction to Chemogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fatty acid mimetics (FAM) are bioactive molecules acting through the binding sites of endogenous fatty acid metabolites on enzymes, transporters, and receptors. Due to the special characteristics of these binding sites, FAMs share common chemical features. Pharmacological modulation of fatty acid signaling has therapeutic potential in multiple pathologies, and several FAMs have been developed as drugs. We aimed to elucidate the promiscuity of FAM drugs on lipid-activated transcription factors and tested 64 approved compounds for activation of RAR, PPARs, VDR, LXR, FXR, and RXR. The activity screening revealed nuclear receptor agonism of several FAM drugs and considerable promiscuity of NSAIDs, while other compound classes evolved as selective. These screening results were not anticipated by three well-established target prediction tools, suggesting that FAMs are underrepresented in bioactivity data for model development. The screening dataset may therefore valuably contribute to such tools. Oxaprozin (RXR), tianeptine (PPARδ), mycophenolic acid (RAR), and bortezomib (RAR) exhibited selective agonism on one nuclear receptor and emerged as attractive leads for the selective optimization of side activities. Additionally, their nuclear receptor agonism may contribute relevant and valuable polypharmacology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.