Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077348›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Monitoring of Breast Cancer.

Ana Julia Aguiar de Freitas, Rhafaela Lima Causin, Muriele Bertagna Varuzza, Stéphanie Calfa, Cassio Murilo Trovo Hidalgo Filho, Tatiana Takahasi Komoto, Cristiano de Pádua Souza, Márcia Maria Chiquitelli Marques

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Julia Aguiar de FreitasMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-2093
Rhafaela Lima CausinMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1749-9736
Muriele Bertagna VaruzzaMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-6440
Stéphanie CalfaMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-8720
Cassio Murilo Trovo Hidalgo FilhoInstituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil.
Tatiana Takahasi KomotoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5287-0866
Cristiano de Pádua SouzaBarretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6412-8041
Márcia Maria Chiquitelli MarquesMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos 14784-400, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-6710

Funding

Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia - DECIT, Ministério da Saúde 879848/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. The treatment of BC is complicated owing to intratumoral complexity. Tissue biopsy and immunohistochemistry are the current gold standard techniques to guide breast cancer therapy; however, these techniques do not assess tumoral molecular heterogeneity. Personalized medicine aims to overcome these biological and clinical complexities. Advances in techniques and computational analyses have enabled increasingly sensitive, specific, and accurate application of liquid biopsy. Such progress has ushered in a new era in precision medicine, where the objective is personalized treatment of breast cancer, early screening, accurate diagnosis and prognosis, relapse detection, longitudinal monitoring, and drug selection. Liquid biopsy can be defined as the sampling of components of tumor cells that are released from a tumor and/or metastatic deposits into the blood, urine, feces, saliva, and other biological substances. Such components include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA), platelets, and exosomes. This review aims to highlight the role of liquid biopsy in breast cancer and precision medicine.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNANeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAbreast cancerliquid biopsyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID36077348
PMCPMC9456236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.