Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077252›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Prime Editing: An All-Rounder for Genome Editing.

Chenyu Lu, Jingyu Kuang, Tong Shao, Sisi Xie, Ming Li, Lingyun Zhu, Lvyun Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Fish Gene Editing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Exploring gene editing as a potential therapeutic strategy for hemophilia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advancing Precision Medicine: Recent Innovations in Gene Editing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Synonymous edits in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. CRISPR/Cas9 Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics: progress and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  17. Current advancement in the application of prime editing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Therapeutic Application of mRNA for Genetic Diseases.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenyu LuDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Jingyu KuangDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Tong ShaoDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Sisi XieDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Lingyun ZhuDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Lvyun ZhuDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, College of Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-5981

Funding

Fund for NUDT Young Innovator Awards 20190104Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2022JJ30672'Huxiang Young Talents Plan' Project of Hunan Province 2019RS2030National Natural Science Foundation of China 31870855National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prime editing (PE), as a "search-and-replace" genome editing technology, has shown the attractive potential of versatile genome editing ability, which is, in principle, currently superior to other well-established genome-editing technologies in the all-in-one operation scope. However, essential technological solutions of PE technology, such as the improvement of genome editing efficiency, the inhibition of potential off-targets and intended edits accounting for unexpected side-effects, and the development of effective delivery systems, are necessary to broaden its application. Since the advent of PE, many optimizations have been performed on PE systems to improve their performance, resulting in bright prospects for application in many fields. This review briefly discusses the development of PE technology, including its functional principle, noteworthy barriers restraining its application, current efforts in technical optimization, and its application directions and potential risks. This review may provide a concise and informative insight into the burgeoning field of PE, highlight the exciting prospects for this powerful tool, and provide clues for questions that may propel the field forward.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Editingapplicationsgenome editingprime editingtechnical optimization

Identifiers

PMID36077252
PMCPMC9456398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.