Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36077051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Effects of Two Distinct Psychoactive Microbes,

Sandor Haas-Neill, Eiko Iwashita, Anna Dvorkin-Gheva, Paul Forsythe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Probiotics for the treatment of depression and its comorbidities: A systemic review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandor Haas-NeillThe Brain Body Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7981-5285
Eiko IwashitaThe Brain Body Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada.
Anna Dvorkin-GhevaMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Paul ForsytheDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 569 Heritage Medical Research Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada.
St. Joseph Hospital · USMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of the microbiota-gut-brain axis has led to proposed microbe-based therapeutic strategies in mental health, including the use of mood-altering bacterial species, termed psychobiotics. However, we still have limited understanding of the key signaling pathways engaged by specific organisms in modulating brain function, and evidence suggests that bacteria with broadly similar neuroactive and immunomodulatory actions can drive different behavioral outcomes. We sought to identify pathways distinguishing two psychoactive bacterial strains that seemingly engage similar gut-brain signaling pathways but have distinct effects on behaviour. We used RNAseq to identify mRNAs differentially expressed in the blood and hippocampus of mice following

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusProbioticsAffectAnimalsBrainHippocampusMaleMiceRNA, MessengerRNA, Messengerblooddepressiongut–brain-axishippocampusJB-1microbiotamiRNAmRNApsychobioticsstress

Identifiers

PMID36077051
PMCPMC9456087
OpenAlexW4293217574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.