Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076889›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison of Nutrition and Flavor Characteristics of Five Breeds of Pork in China.

Yin Zhang, Yingjie Zhang, Hui Li, Tianrong Guo, Jianlin Jia, Pengcheng Zhang, Linguo Wang, Ning Xia, Qin Qian, Haichuan Peng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nutritional Processing Quality of Sika Deer (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yin ZhangMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-4358
Yingjie ZhangMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-8811
Hui LiMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Tianrong GuoChengdu Institute of Food Inspection, Chengdu 611130, China.
Jianlin JiaMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Pengcheng ZhangMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Linguo WangMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Ning XiaMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Qin QianMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Haichuan PengMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Zhongli PanDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Dayu LiuMeat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Liming ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, R&D Center of Separation and Extraction Technology in Fermentation Industry, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.

Funding

The Science and Technology Department of Sichuan 2019YFN0172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize the quality of widely consumed pork in China, the chemical compositions and other indexes of five breeds of pork were compared. The results indicated that the moisture content, sensory flavor, and overall acceptability of Pipa pork (PPP) were superior to other breeds. The fat content and essential amino acids (EAA) of Yihao native pork (YNP) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in other breeds. The protein content, the total amount of amino acids, and perceptible flavor of Tibetan black pork (TBP) were higher than in other breeds. The protein nutrition profiles of manor black pork (MBP) and TBP were better than in others. The equivalent umami concentration (EUC) value of white pork (WP) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in others; however, the health risk of its fatty acid content was higher. There were unique protein and flavor chemicals in YNP, TBP, and PPP, which may be useful for distinguishing their authenticity.

Indexed as

EUC valueflavormeatynutritionporktasteumami

Identifiers

PMID36076889
PMCPMC9455266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.