SynthesisSystematic reviews2022
Extracellular vesicles for ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from animal models.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma from Cardiac Surgery Patients Induces Endothelial and Tubular Epithelial Cell Damage: Potential Role in Acute Kidney Injury Development-A Preliminary Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Translational Potential: Kidney Tubuloids in Precision Medicine and Regenerative Nephrology.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Exploring Chinese Herbal Medicines for Acute Kidney Injury: Pharmacological Mechanisms and Clinical Potential.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Cell and extracellular vesicle therapies for AKI in critical care: clinical translation, organ-support integration, and lessons learned.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles mediate immune regulation in acute kidney injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Organ-Specific Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Ischemic Acute Organ Injury: Mechanisms, Successes, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Emerging Frontiers in acute kidney injury: The role of extracellular vesicles.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Targeted Cells Release Secondary Effector EVs: Indication of How To Account for Histocompatibility and Disease Specificity of EV Treatments.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Review
- Delivery-mediated exosomal therapeutics in ischemia-reperfusion injury: advances, mechanisms, and future directions.Nano convergence · 2024Review
- Small RNA-big impact: exosomal miRNAs in mitochondrial dysfunction in various diseases.RNA biology · 2024Review
- Efficacy of Mesenchymal-Stromal-Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Ameliorating Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity, as Modeled Using Three-Dimensional, Gravity-Driven, Two-Layer Tubule-on-a-Chip (3D-MOTIVE Chip).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Naïve or Engineered Extracellular Vesicles from Different Cell Sources: Therapeutic Tools for Kidney Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) induced by ischemia/reperfusion injury significantly contribute to the burden of end-stage renal disease. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), especially for stem/progenitor cell-derived EVs (stem/progenitor cell-EVs), have emerged as a promising therapy for ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced AKI. However, their regulatory effects remain poorly understood, and their therapeutic efficiency in clinical trials is controversial. Here, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the stem/progenitor cell-EV efficacy in treating ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced AKI in preclinical rodent models.
methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify controlled studies about the therapeutic efficiency of stem/progenitor cell-EVs on ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced AKI rodent models. The level of SCr, an indicator of renal function, was regarded as the primary outcome. Meta-regression analysis was used to reveal the influential factors of EV therapy. Sensitivity analysis, cumulative meta-analysis, and assessment of publication bias were also performed in our systematic review and meta-analysis. A standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the common effect size between stem/progenitor cell-EV-treated and control groups, with values of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 defined as small, medium, large, and very large effect sizes, respectively.
resultsA total of 30 studies with 985 ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced AKI rodent models were included. The pooled results showed that EV injection could lead to a remarkable sCr reduction compared with the control group (SMD, - 3.47; 95%CI, - 4.15 to - 2.80; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the EV treatment group had lower levels of BUN (SMD, - 3.60; 95%CI, - 4.25 to - 2.94; P < 0.001), indexes for tubular and endothelial injury, renal fibrosis (fibrosis score and α-SMA), renal inflammation (TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS, and CD68 + macrophages), but higher levels of indexes for tubular proliferation, angiogenesis-related VEGF, and reactive oxygen species. However, our meta-regression analysis did not identify significant associations between sCr level and cell origins of EVs, injection doses, delivery routes, and therapy and outcome measurement time (all P values > 0.05). Significant publication bias was observed (Egger's test, P < 0.001).
conclusionStem/progenitor cell-EVs are effective in improving renal function in rodent ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced AKI model. These vesicles may help (i) reduce cell apoptosis and stimulate cell proliferation, (ii) ameliorate inflammatory injury and renal fibrosis, (iii) promote angiogenesis, and (iv) inhibit oxidative stress. However, the current systematic review and meta-analysis did not identify significant influential factors associated with treatment effects. More preclinical studies and thoughtfully designed animal studies are needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.