Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076301›Full record

ReviewJournal of cheminformatics2022

Review of techniques and models used in optical chemical structure recognition in images and scanned documents.

Fidan Musazade, Narmin Jamalova, Jamaladdin Hasanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cheminformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A review of transformer models in drug discovery and beyond.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fidan MusazadeSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Narmin JamalovaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Jamaladdin HasanovSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States. jhasanov@ada.edu.az.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extraction of chemical formulas from images was not in the top priority of Computer Vision tasks for a while. The complexity both on the input and prediction sides has made this task challenging for the conventional Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning problems. A binary input image which might seem trivial for convolutional analysis was not easy to classify, since the provided sample was not representative of the given molecule: to describe the same formula, a variety of graphical representations which do not resemble each other can be used. Considering the variety of molecules, the problem shifted from classification to that of formula generation, which makes Natural Language Processing (NLP) a good candidate for an effective solution. This paper describes the evolution of approaches from rule-based structure analyses to complex statistical models, and compares the efficiency of models and methodologies used in the recent years. Although the latest achievements deliver ideal results on particular datasets, the authors mention possible problems for various scenarios and provide suggestions for further development.

Indexed as

AttentionAugmentationChemical imagesComputer visionInChILSTMMoleculesTransformersViT

Identifiers

PMID36076301
PMCPMC9461257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.