ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2022
The core bacterial microbiome of banana (Musa spp.).
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revealing and characterizing bacterial communities of in vitro Musa species through 16S rDNA metabarcoding and culture dependent approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diverse banana endophytes reveal potential genotype-driven community structure affected by domestication.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Dynamics in Microbial Communities Associated with the Development of Soil Fatigue in Banana.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Banana genotype-associated microbiomes play an essential role in suppressing Fusarium wilt.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Farming System and Nematodes Affect the Rhizosphere Microbiome of Tropical Banana Plants.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Deciphering the microbiome dynamics in an effective banana Fusarium wilt biocontrol interaction system.3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Altered rhizosphere microbiome composition associated with B-subgenome cultivars of diploid and triploid banana plants.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Identifying bacterial and fungal communities associated with Fusarium-wilt symptomatic and non-symptomatic 'Gros Michel' banana plants in Ecuador.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Metagenomic insights to bacterial communities, functional traits, and soil health in banana smallholder agroecosystems of Kenya.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Core Microbiome and Microbial Community Structure in Coralloid Roots ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Composition and variability of core phyllosphere fungal mycobiota on field-grown broccoli.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- The core fungal microbiome of banana (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Nitrogen fertilizer rate but not form affects the severity of Fusarium wilt in banana.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBananas (Musa spp.) are a globally significant crop and are severely afflicted by diseases for which there are no effective chemical controls. Banana microbiomes may provide novel solutions to these constraints but are difficult to manage due to their high diversity and variability between locations. Hence 'common core' taxa, which are a subset of the microbiome that frequent all, or most, individuals of a host species, represent logical targets for the development of microbiome management approaches. Here, we first performed a pot experiment to characterise the effects of two factors that are likely to differ between farms (viz. edaphic conditions and host genotype) on bacterial diversity in bulk soil and seven plant compartments. From this experiment, we created shortlisted core 'candidates' that were then refined using a survey of 52 field-grown Musa spp. We confirmed the importance of the core through network analysis and by comparing the sequences of our core taxa with those reported in 22 previous studies.
resultsDiversity was found to differ between plant compartments and soils, but not genotypes. Therefore, we identified populations that were frequent across most plants irrespective of the soil in which they were grown. This led to the selection of 36 'common core' bacteria, that represented 65-95% of the dominant taxa in field-grown plants and were identified as highly interconnected 'hubs' using network analysis - a characteristic shown to be indicative of microbes that influence host fitness in studies of other plants. Lastly, we demonstrated that the core taxa are closely related to banana-associated bacteria observed on five other continents.
conclusionsOur study provides a robust list of common core bacterial taxa for Musa spp. Further research may now focus on how changes in the frequencies and activities of these most persistent taxa influence host fitness. Notably, for several of our core taxa, highly similar populations have already been isolated in previous studies and may be amenable to such experimentation. This contribution should help to accelerate the development of effective Musa spp. microbiome management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.