Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076191›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Healthcare practitioner perceptions on barriers impacting cannabis prescribing practices.

Yasmina Hachem, Sara J Abdallah, Sergio Rueda, Jessica L Wiese, Kamna Mehra, Jennifer Rup, Juthaporn Cowan, Antonio Vigano, Cecilia T Costiniuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence synthesis of medical cannabis research: current challenges and opportunities.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cannabis use among recently treated cancer patients: perceptions and experiences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yasmina HachemMedical Cannabis Program in Oncology, Cedars Cancer Center, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boulevard Decarie, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada.
Sara J AbdallahDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Sergio RuedaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Jessica L WieseCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Kamna MehraCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Jennifer RupCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Juthaporn CowanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Antonio ViganoMedical Cannabis Program in Oncology, Cedars Cancer Center, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boulevard Decarie, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada.
Cecilia T CostiniukDivision of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illnesses Service, McGill University Health Centre, Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, McGill Research Center for Cannabis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. cecilia.costiniuk@mcgill.ca.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAOttawa Hospital · CAOttawa Hospital Research Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanadians seeking medical cannabis (MC) may encounter difficulties in finding a healthcare provider (HCP) who authorizes their access to it. Barriers that HCPs face in authorizing MC are unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate HCP opinions, knowledge, comfort, and practice in MC prescribing and counseling on recreational cannabis use, and whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected MC prescribing practices.

methodsEligible participants included HCPs (e.g., attending physicians, nurses, pharmacists) in Canada. A questionnaire evaluating their knowledge, comfort, and practice in medical and recreational cannabis was designed based on instruments developed in previous studies. Between April 13

resultsTwenty-four organizations agreed to disseminate the survey and 70 individuals completed it. Of respondents, 71% were attending physicians or medical residents, while the remainder were nurses, pharmacists or other HCPs. Almost none (6%) received training in MC in professional school but 60% did receive other training (e.g., workshops, conferences). Over half (57%) received more questions regarding MC since recreational cannabis was legalized, and 82% reported having patients who use MC. However, 56% felt uncomfortable or ambivalent regarding their knowledge of MC, and 27% were unfamiliar with the requirements for obtaining MC in Canada. The most common symptoms for recommending MC were pain and nausea, whereas the most common conditions for recommending it were cancer and intractable pain. The strongest barrier to authorizing MC was uncertainty in safe and effective dosage and routes of administration. The strongest barrier to recommending or authorizing MC was the lack of research evidence demonstrating its safety and efficacy. During the pandemic, many respondents reported that a greater number of their patients used cannabis to relieve anxiety and depression.

conclusionsOur results suggest that HCPs across Canada who responded to our survey are unfamiliar with topics related to MC. The strongest barriers appear to be lack of clinical research, and uncertainty in safe and effective MC administration. Increasing research, training, and knowledge may help HCPs feel more equipped to make informed treatment/prescribing decisions, which may help to improve access to MC.

Indexed as

CannabisCOVID-19Medical MarijuanaAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaHumansPandemicsMedical MarijuanaAttitude of health personnelCanadaCovid-19Medical cannabisSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36076191
PMCPMC9453734
OpenAlexW4294954925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.